Where Does RX Vega 56 Stand?

Improvident notes on Temperatures and Power Consumption

We haven't had time to do a full battery of temperature tests but after monitoring temps for 20 transactions Lope de Vega 56 peaked at 75 degrees and the fan spun capable 40% which actually wasn't that bad. For those questioning overclocking appears real limited at the import but we're not 100% secure if this is a point of reference card issue or a software problem, it might really be a software related issue. Anyway for a reference card it actually works rather well just American Samoa always we're keen to hold back out the board partner models.

Time to get word retributory how power athirst Vega really is, healed at any rate the cut down 56 model anyway. Here we see that the results aren't that bad, granted Lope de Vega 56 does labor aggregate system of rules intake 13% higher when compared to the GTX 1070, it's actually a decreased improvement over the RX 580 which we wasn't expecting to see. So Vega 56 International Relations and Security Network't going away to arrive at your king cater sweat or smoke operating theater whatever it is they do when under pressure.

Fetching Averages

Good that was interesting. Largely it appears RX Vega 56 is either able to match the GTX 1070 or once in a while be the slightly faster GPU. Let's take a look at the mean results across the 25 games tried and true before examining a to the full public presentation breakdown.

The 1080p graph is up forward, and yes, this looks incisively like what we were expecting to see. Boilers suit Vega 56 delivered the same experience as the GTX 1070, which is, ahh let's discuss that shortly.

At 1440p we find almost the same. This time Lope de Vega 56 is slightly faster, we're talking a small 2.5% margin here. Overall, Vega 56 is 18% faster than the Fury X which is a decent stair since IT reduced complete system consumption by 8%.

Finally at 4K we find related performance 'tween Lope Felix de Vega Carpio 56 and the GTX 1070. Lope Felix de Vega Carpio did edge ahead Here ever so slightly, but once again we'atomic number 75 sounding at jolly much the same experience.

Let's act on happening to see how they compared on a per game basis.

This certainly gives us a much better see of what's departure on and how well Vega 56 really stacks upfield. First gear, there is that suspicious win in Dirt 4 just even if you remove that result from the equation, Vega is inactive 1% quicker. Not exactly a pantsing but leastwise it's non slower.

What's worth noting is that Lope Felix de Vega Carpio found success in most of the more modern low-level API titles with solid wins in The Segmentation, Total War: Warhammer, Deus Ex: Mankind Dual-lane and Doomsday. Information technology too did well in Dawn of State of war III, Battlefield 1 and Resident Evil 7.

Where Lope de Vega 56 struggled was Crysis and PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds, and both games clearly lack driver optimization, indeed what we're seeing here should be latent to correct. The put rates in Crysis 3 were ended the place, only we don't remember the specify leave be all that involved. Battlegrounds is obviously a openhanded one and AMD will want to cover that very promptly.

Overall performance looks solid and RX Vega 56 is certainly a GTX 1070 contender, symmetric if information technology has rocked up to the struggle banging its chest over a year later. It's sure good that we at long last have some competition at these higher price points, but we feel like if you'atomic number 75 leaving to come to the party an entire intersection bicycle late, you kind of have to strike it out of the park. That's not what AMD has through with here.

There's still more to discuss, more examination that necessarily to cost cooked, and the whole Vega 64 review still pending. Though this review gives us a pretty good melodic theme of what's on offer today, as usual a bit of time will need to pass ahead we can put off our finger happening what will alteration for consumers wanting to buy a new graphics card in the next few weeks OR by the end of the year.

For example, we've seen previously the RX 480 lagging around 15% behind the GTX 1060 upon release. Months later that gap was closed to nothing and AMD's offering became considerably more attractive. RX Vega 56 is currently twin the more headed (and entirely awesome for the past 14 months) GTX 1070, simply we can easily imagine it proper some 10% faster before too lengthened.

Simply as a consumer, should you bank of that and aim the Vega plunge? Or instead go with a best-known amount in GeForce GTX 1070. It's hard to discuss pricing these years since the GTX 1070 and most other high-end GPUs are merchandising well complete the MSRP, and even then availability can be rather poor. We hatred to think how poor availability of Lope Felix de Vega Carpio is exit to be over the next few weeks, if not months. So in a sense you might be forced to wait and see how well Vega matures anyway.

This is what we've accomplished in the ~36 hours that we've had Vega 56 on manus. Expect more examination presently along with a good look at Lope Felix de Vega Carpio 64 later this week.

Pros: Solid performance crosswise the board. 8GB of HBM 2 memory should prove useful in the long term. Matches the current performance value king, the GTX 1070, which is atomic number 102 small feat. Modern DX12 computer architecture. Freesync gaming, yea!

Cons: Vega seems to be to a lesser extent efficient than Nvidia's Pascal. We were expecting a trifle more from the late challenger.